I'll be having a go at some Zwift team time trials so I thought I would give a quick brain dump on thoughts about how to handle them.
Key thing is that it
is not like a real TTT.
There is no element of luck.
There is minimal skill, just the ability to hold a pace-line rather than a blob and to shift the lead every now and then.
So the
main risk is not luck or lack of skill but mistakes and miscommunication, both can be
minimised by clear planning.
This
planning is easy. It simplest to think of a Zwift TTT not as a race
but a combination of
- Mathematical puzzle
- Specialist roles
- Individual workouts with intervals and recovery
- Bell Ringing
- Communication
Puzzle
The
puzzle is an equation where the variables are the power capabilities
of all the riders. The solution is the one that uses these
capabilities to produce the maximum average power for the expected
duration of the ride.*
If the team has a mathematician they may
be able to create a model that does this. If not then it will take a
bit more time to come up with a solution but not that much.
It will just involve picking a target power, say 350W and then seeing if its possible to plan individual workouts that will hit it. Depending on result then just need to increase or decrease target and reiterate.
The first
time will be the most difficult thereafter it will be more straight
forward.
The
key information needed is the power capabilities of the riders. A
simple MMP will be a good starting point.
The other vital information
needed is the effect of drafting, luckily this is covered by Zwift Insider
article here.https://zwiftinsider.com/speed-tests-ttt/
*
The course profile is another variable but less than in real life so
can be ignored on all but courses with significant climbs (not sure
if these will feature in TTTs anyway)
Roles
The
objective is to get 4 riders across the line at the highest average
power possible. This implies at least 2 different roles.
- Finishers – who will finish the race
- Shooting Stars – who will burn themselves out during the race knowing they do not need to finish
Depending
on the mix of abilities in the finishers there may need to be an
additional role
- Stayer – who must finish but to do so will spend less time at the front and maybe do no pulls at all in the final stages.
According
to the Zwift article the fourth rider already has a significant
advantage. So my guess is that only four finishers are really needed,
having more will not offer any advantage only some contingency, which
should not be needed given the absence of luck.
Individual
workouts
Each
rider will have their own "workout". This will have consist
of a series of time durations, power and position in group. (Power
will either be a specific watts target or a rough zone)
When combined all the workouts will end up with a constant seamless power in the lead position
As
an e.g. For a Shooting Star who will do 3 pulls
1
minute Tempo Postion 2
1
minute 350W Lead
3
minutes LSD Position 6
1
minute Tempo Position 2
1
minute 350W Lead
3
minutes LSD Position 6
1
minute Tempo Position 2
1
minute 350W or more Lead
Recover,
stay with group as long as possible then stop
The only difference from a normal workout is that each interval shift, especially into and out of lead position will not be sudden but a ramp of around 5-10 seconds.
Each
team member sign off that they can do their workout and will then be
able to practice doing it individually e.g by joining any Zwift race.
Bell Ringing
This
is synchronising all the workouts so that everyone knows what they
are doing when and the changeover at the front is smooth. My personal
opinion is that in order to minimise errors pulls should be on the
long side rather than quickly alternating. The latter may be faster
(depends I think on the capabiliites of the team) but the cock up
potential is much bigger too.
Basically
what you end up with is a spreadsheet showing all the riders, who is
doing what when. If this is executed then the team will have ridden
at close to optimum.
This may sound a bit complicated but it pretty much the same as ringing a peal of bells and much less complicated (thanks to Mrs M for specialist advise on this matter)
Communication
In an ideal world this will not be needed but things don't work out that way and clear communication will be needed in order to help things run smoothly and deal with issues if they crop up.
The
best way to handle this would be to have a "sporting director"
watching the race who is also on the discord channel. They would have
the master schedule in front of them and call up the changes as they
are due to happen just in case riders get confused. So if things go
well and according to plan the sporting director should be the only
one who needs to talk and that only to announce the changes.
The
sporting director will also make calls in case of issues.
- The default in case a rider blows up early will be to call up the next one on the rota. This may mean calling things on the fly at the end of the race but with fewer riders at this point it should not be too difficult. The rider blowing up will continue to try to complete the rest of their workout.
- The default if a rider is dropped ahead of schedule will be to let them drop. Depending on the race situation some riders may then be asked to do longer pulls in order to cover for the one missing.
Other thoughts
The
biggest risk of gaps is on climbs. Everyone should have the
difficulty slider set all the way to the left to reduce this. It may
also be necessary to compromise bike choice so that some riders
sacrifice a bit of aero for a faster climbing bike especially if the
climbs spend any time over 7%. Trial and error is probably the only
way to find out if this is necessary and/or works.
Everyone
should check their height is really what they think it is (rather
depressingly I did this and found I have shrunk a couple of cm.)
Smaller riders get an advantage and this is one time it's best not be
a six footer. (Unlike in real life big riders do not, to the best of
my knowledge at least, provide more Zwift drag protection than little
ones)
No comments:
Post a Comment